| JEWISH DEFENSE LEAGUE PLOTS TO MURDER U.S. CONGRESSMAN, TRAGEDY AVERTED
WASHINGTON, D.C.—At a moment when the popular mind-set once
again links the words "Arab" and "Islamic" with all things retrograde
and threatening—including terrorism (cue the new Charlie Daniels anthem
and revel in the poetry: "This ain't no rag, it's a flag/And we don't
wear it on our heads. . . . /We're gonna hunt you down like a mad dog
hound")—it came as a surprise to some that the latest malefactors
accorded POW status in the "War on Terrorism" turned out to be Jewish.
Arrested and charged last week with intriguing to do explosive
little actions on a Culver City, California, mosque and the offices of
Lebanese American U.S. Representative Darrell Issa, Jewish Defense
League chief Irving David
Rubin and JDL member Earl Leslie Krugel were, according to FBI
wiretap transcripts, anything but circumspect about their devices and
desires: Though Rubin lamented the wanting state of technology in the
JDL's possession (not good enough to "blow up an entire building"),
Krugel was adamant that "Arabs need a wake-up call" and that the JDL
needs to do something to one of their "filthy mosques"—which may
explain the five pounds of gunpowder and pipe-bomb matériel found at
his house. "If the people responsible for September 11 are the
quintessence of evil genius, these guys are at the Keystone Kops end of
the spectrum," says Hussein Ibish, communications director for the
American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee. "The only reassuring thing
about them is their absolute ineptitude and the fact that they were
arrested."
Mainstream Jewish groups were quick to condemn the JDL as well:
Characterizing the activities of the organization—founded in 1968 by
Brooklyn's own, now deceased Rabbi Meir Kahane—as "contemptible," the
Anti-Defamation League's regional director issued a statement
"abhor[ing] and condemn[ing] the potential terrorist plot." The
American Jewish Committee said it "categorically condemns in the
strongest possible terms the alleged JDL plot," and went so far as to
follow up with a personal letter to Republican representative Issa,
decrying "such wanton lawlessness," which is "so clearly contrary to
the fundamental tenets of our faith, and to the basic principles of
justice and liberty that brought our parents and grandparents to
America's shores and that form the bedrock of our national values."
Yet some observers of the current Middle East crisis see more
than a bit of disingenuousness and historical irony here. While both
the ADL and the AJC have condemned the JDL, they've unequivocally
backed Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon's indiscriminate use of
force against the Palestinians and the cutting of ties with Palestinian
Authority president Yasir Arafat—neither of which is universally seen
as a particularly constructive way to slow the cycles of violence
across Israel and the Occupied Territories.
But what's even more vexing to others is the apparent inability
or unwillingness to discern similarities between the current
Palestinian milieu and Israeli operations of 50-plus years ago, which
secured statehood from colonialist occupiers—as well as similarities
between violent, internecine struggles among disparate underground
groups. "It's peculiar, it's paradoxical, that Sharon and Likud should
be the ones who are trying to equate any authentic resistance in
Palestine with some of the terrorist activities, as terrorism in Israel
really started with Begin and Shamir and later Sharon," says Clovis
Maksoud, the former Arab League ambassador to the United Nations. "It's
a very valid question as to why they see no similarities between
themselves under the British and the Palestinians under their
occupation." Especially, he adds, as the Israeli government supports
museums that honor assassins and terrorists—including one located on a
street named for a terrorist.
The thoroughfare in question runs between Florentine and
Emeq-Yisrael, and bears the name Stern Street—in honor of Avraham
Stern, a 1920s Zionist and charter member of the Haganah, then a
loose-knit Jewish militia organized as a self-defense mechanism against
Arab violence. Finding the Haganah insufficiently proactive in
realizing the goal of a Jewish state that would encompass "both sides
of the River Jordan," erstwhile Mussolini follower and early-day
ultra-nationalist Ze'ev Jabotinsky broke with the militia and formed
the Irgun, which devoted itself to terrorist operations against the
British. Once an enthusiastic Irgunist, Stern was appalled when the
Irgun decided to make common cause with the British against the Nazis,
and created the even more underground and more violent Lehi (Lohamei
Herut Yisrael, or Fighters for the Freedom of Israel), also known as
the Stern Gang, which held there was no greater threat to the Jews of
Palestine than the mandate's British administrators.
To this end, Stern actually made overtures to the Axis powers;
September 1940 found him in dialogue with an emissary from Il Duce in
Jerusalem, and in January 1941 he dispatched an agent to
Vichy-controlled Beirut with instructions to convey a letter to
representatives of the Reich. In it, Stern held that the "establishment
of the historical Jewish state on a national and totalitarian basis,
and bound by a treaty with the German Reich, would be in the interest
of a maintained and strengthened future German position of power in the
Near East. Proceeding from these considerations, [the Lehi] in
Palestine, under the condition [that] the above-mentioned national
aspirations of the Israeli freedom movement are recognized on the side
of the German Reich, offers to actively take part in the war on
Germany's side."
The Germans declined to take Stern up on the offer, but Stern
held out hope as his organization continued to engage in terrorism
against the British. After Stern died in a shoot-out with British
police in 1942, his mantle was picked up by future Israeli prime
minister Yitzhak Shamir. Still, the Israeli underground focused on the
British as the greatest of all evils, and on November 6, 1944, Lord
Moyne, the British minister for Middle East affairs, was assassinated
in Cairo by Eliyahu Beit-Tzuri and Eliyahu Hakim—both members of the
Lehi, who were later arrested, convicted, and hanged. After the state
of Israel was established, the Lehi, displeased with what it considered
the too pro-Arab views of the Swedish UN-appointed mediator for
Palestine, assassinated him; on September 17, 1948, Count Folke
Bernadotte—who, as a neutral diplomat in World War II, had saved
thousands of Jews from Nazi death camps—was shot and killed by Lehi
assassins, along with French colonel Andre Serot, the senior UN
military observer, whose wife's life had been saved by Bernadotte.
The Bernadotte assassination was so outrageous that the nascent
government of David Ben-Gurion had little problem disbanding the Lehi
(though none of the assassins were ever brought to justice). Yet,
despite this history of terror, the Israeli Ministry of Defense
underwrites museums commemorating the Stern Gang and the Irgun—which,
under Menachem Begin, bombed the British headquarters at the King David
Hotel in 1946, leaving 90 dead and 45 wounded (with 15 Jews among the
casualties). Like Lehi, it wasn't until 1948 that the Irgun was forced
out of existence, after its arms-transport ship, the Altalena, was blown up by the provisional Israeli government—a point analysts like Ibish say bears remembering.
"There are streets named after the assassins of Moyne and
Bernadotte. They are historical figures not disavowed by the rhetoric
of the state of Israel, nor is there any reflection on the fact that
two terrorist leaders later became distinguished leaders of the
republic," Ibish says. "And now people are saying that Arafat must have
his Altalena." Ibish adds that Israel's first prime minister,
David Ben-Gurion, "never moved against the Irgun and the Stern Gang
until after the state was established and secured, which is definitely
not true in the case of the Palestinian Authority. Essentially, the
Israelis are asking the Palestinians to do something they themselves
refused to do."
http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0151,vest,30862,1.html
COHEN'S COMMENTARY
My take on the JDL?
The Jewish Defense League is a terrorist/extremist organization.
The JDL is not representative of Jewry. We have a religion of
peace and tolerance. JDL members are nothing more than extremists
and terrorists who give all Jews a bad name.
|